
LPs & GPs benefit from mutual support
Emerging from the recessions, GPs are facing a new reality in their LP relations. Investors are becoming increasingly selective, and approach negotiations with more assertiveness. However, as Francinia Protti-Alvarez finds, the new GP/LP relationship could still be one of balance rather than a zero-sum game.
The generalised perception of private equity power relations pre-credit crisis saw GPs as the ones with the upper hand, able to choose at leisure from a large pool of LPs. Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, however, a fragile and unspoken agreement was established between GPs and LPs, as many GPs, not being able to generate returns, opted against making capital calls providing in turn many LPs with the room to breathe.
At present, the media has been alluding to a change in the ‘balance of power' between LPs and GPs - a marked shift that sees LPs take control.
Further proof of this shift was witnessed in September last year when the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) issued guidelines that urged better terms for investors including greater disclosure, minutes at advisory committee meetings and reduced transaction fees. Last month, we saw a continuation of sorts. Executives of TPG, KKR, Carlyle Group, Avenue Capital Group (one of the first managers to endorse the ILPA guidelines) and Silver Lake Partners finally met with their investors to discuss giving LPs more rights and lower fees.
Indeed, much of the debate on the balance of power shift has centred around fees and alignment of interests. Still though, some believe that this shift is detracting from the real issue: The debate around fees may be a red herring", notes Alan MacKay, CEO of fund-of funds Hermes GPE. He continues: "The standardised fund structure works for the large majority of LPs. The discussion on fees is a fair one but it is mostly pertinent to the 10-20 private equity firms with mega funds; and in this case, it is likely there will be an alignment."
He continues: "There are other important areas where we see a shift in influence. For instance, LPs are tightening parameters in the GPs mandate, narrowing down the exception criteria to make sure the GP remains focused on its investment criteria. Similarly, fund extensions are now being approached as a genuine two-way discussion. Another area that has grown in importance is corporate governance and responsible investment."
So what many would have perhaps conceived as a battle of wills is being approached by both sides as a constructive dialogue rather than a zero-sum game. The industry appears to be taking the opportunity to refine the private equity model and ensure it works for all sides and at all stages.
The re-working of this model is evident to many: "The fear of exclusion has evaporated, LPs feel that they can now speak more assertively and be heard," observes MacKay.
Latest News
Stonehage Fleming raises USD 130m for largest fund to date, eyes 2024 programme
Multi-family office has seen strong appetite, with investor base growing since 2016 to more than 90 family offices, Meiping Yap told Unquote
Permira to take Ergomed private for GBP 703m
Sponsor deploys Permira VIII to ride new wave of take-privates; Blackstone commits GBP 200m in financing for UK-based CRO
Partners Group to release IMs for Civica sale in mid-September
Sponsor acquired the public software group in July 2017 via the same-year vintage Partners Group Global Value 2017
Change of mind: Sponsors take to de-listing their own assets
EQT and Cinven seen as bellweather for funds to reassess options for listed assets trading underwater