
Regulation update: FATCA

In this week's regulation update, Anneken Tappe takes a look at the impact of FATCA in Europe.
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act is the second US-specific law in the bulk of new regulation. At its core, FATCA proposes a 30% withholding tax on all withholdable payments of persons and entities that fail to disclose US account holders to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This means that foreign financial institutions (FFIs) will have to either seal their US operations off into separate incorporated entities or will have to erase critical accounts from their balance sheets.
FATCA's most controversial feature is the necessary disclosure of LPs under the act, which could breach data protection laws in some countries.
Compliance with one law that causes non-compliance with another means that FATCA will almost undoubtedly increase administrative costs for funds.
The German BVK portrays the tax law very objectively as "an obligatory duty for foreign financial intermediaries", while others consider it a supranational information gathering exercise.
Koos Teule, director of investment relations at Gilde Buyout Partners, deems FATCA's reach intolerable: "FATCA sounds like a nightmare. I don't think it's going to be effective." But not everybody is left outraged by the new administrative burden. Isabel Rodriguez, partner as SJ Berwin in Madrid and member of ASCRI's legal and fiscal committee, thinks the reaction is exaggerated: "To be honest, every time a new regulation comes into force we all worry a lot but in my experience, as soon as we understand the regulation and the procedures that come with it, people adjust, fulfil their obligations and go ahead with business."
Recently, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK have committed to an intergovernmental effort to implement FATCA. This approach was primarily driven by the possible violation of disclosure and data protection laws. The amended regulation foresees reporting to the regional European authorities as opposed to the IRS, and reciprocal automatic exchange in the scope of existing bilateral tax agreements.
KEY FACTS
- Aims to counter offshore tax evasion originating in the US, and increase tax revenue.
- Imposes 30% withholding tax on all withholdable payments in case of non-compliance.
- Passed in March 2010 and due to come into effect on 1 January, 2013:
- New account due diligence procedures for FFIs will be effective from 1 July, 2013.
- Distinguishes between foreign financial institutions (FFIs) and non-financial foreign entities (NFFEs).
- DLA Piper identifies three categories of FFIs:
- Entities accepting deposits in the ordinary course of a financial business;
- Entities holding [financial] assets for the account of others;
- Entities engaging in investment, reinvestment or trading activities.
- In addition DLA Piper indentifies a fourth category:
- US-owned foreign investment vehicles that have to report to the IRS, disregarding other classifications.
Latest News
Stonehage Fleming raises USD 130m for largest fund to date, eyes 2024 programme
Multi-family office has seen strong appetite, with investor base growing since 2016 to more than 90 family offices, Meiping Yap told Unquote
Permira to take Ergomed private for GBP 703m
Sponsor deploys Permira VIII to ride new wave of take-privates; Blackstone commits GBP 200m in financing for UK-based CRO
Partners Group to release IMs for Civica sale in mid-September
Sponsor acquired the public software group in July 2017 via the same-year vintage Partners Group Global Value 2017
Change of mind: Sponsors take to de-listing their own assets
EQT and Cinven seen as bellweather for funds to reassess options for listed assets trading underwater