UK - Walker loophole revealed
The final guidelines announced yesterday by Sir David Walker include a potential loophole which could allow portfolio companies to avoid the disclosure requirements stipulated in the report. The guidelines require enhanced reporting from portfolio companies acquired in a take-private for an enterprise value in excess of £300m, or in a private transaction valued above £500m. However, the report fails to address whether a company acquired for a value below these thresholds that subsequently achieves a size in excess of £300m or £500m through bolt-on acquisitions or organic growth then falls within the guidelines. A source close to the Walker Report said: 'The guidelines are designed to be flexible and to accommodate a wide range of circumstances and therefore "buy and build" companies that cross the thresholds would be expected to conform with the guidelines.’ Vince O’Brien of Montagu Private Equity, a former BVCA chairman, believes that the non-proscriptive nature of the guidelines allows questionable issues to be resolved over time. ‘I think people will adhere to the guidelines in these circumstances. It will be adopted as good practice – that is the beauty of self-regulation and it is good for the industry.’ An industry participant close to the review admitted that, ‘as the report technically states “at the time of acquisition” a company that later grows beyond this size would not have to comply. However, my own personal view is that it is a goodwill-generating exercise so firms should be in compliance. I hope no-one will view it as a loophole.’ Current BVCA chairman Wol Kolade remarked: ‘As the target company progresses, the private equity firm will be expected to play ball. We have the monitoring group which can look across the industry and ask "what about this investment". In addition to the monitoring committee there are the sector committees, which can also point out certain companies. But I doubt it will come to this. Peer pressure works extraordinarily well in an industry as small as ours.’ A note of caution regarding the value thresholds was sounded by Martin Winter of law firm Taylor Wessing. ‘It is a potential anomaly. It would not be right that a company becomes the victim of its own success and is drawn into the enhanced reporting net. If this turned out to be a problem in practice because of a large number of companies of similar size with different reporting requirements it is possible that the guidelines could be amended.'
Latest News
Stonehage Fleming raises USD 130m for largest fund to date, eyes 2024 programme
Multi-family office has seen strong appetite, with investor base growing since 2016 to more than 90 family offices, Meiping Yap told Unquote
Permira to take Ergomed private for GBP 703m
Sponsor deploys Permira VIII to ride new wave of take-privates; Blackstone commits GBP 200m in financing for UK-based CRO
Partners Group to release IMs for Civica sale in mid-September
Sponsor acquired the public software group in July 2017 via the same-year vintage Partners Group Global Value 2017
Change of mind: Sponsors take to de-listing their own assets
EQT and Cinven seen as bellweather for funds to reassess options for listed assets trading underwater