
Regulation threatens present and future of industry
Private equity professionals included a tax neutral regime on their Brussels wish-list at the European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (EVCA) Symposium in Istanbul yesterday.
"The reality of tax havens is that they are there so pension funds don't have to pay tax twice," said outgoing chairman of the EVCA Vincenzo Morelli. "So create something tax neutral; there is some progress to be made there. If we had a good vehicle then that would facilitate investment."
In a similar vein, delegates called for the rise of tailor-made regulation, citing the danger of the one-size-fits-all approach. The role of industry associations as an intermediary between decision-makers and the private equity community was widely lauded as critical in such a context.
"It is fair to say that the difference between private equity and hedge funds was not so clear in the heads of governments around the table [at the time of drafting regulation including AIFMD]," conceded Yves Leterme, deputy secretary general of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and former Prime Minister of Belgium. "I think the EVCA has been successful in speaking to national authorities to explain the difference between alternative asset classes. And there is also now consciousness that whatever the form, we need money to fuel the economy," he added.
Stunting growth
Morelli also called for the prevention of "misguided regulation that artificially restrains long-term capital," echoed in a later plea made by Tim Hames, director general of the BVCA, to Steven Maijoor, chairman of European Securities and Markets Authorities (ESMA): "My biggest concern is not that regulation will strangle existing firms, but that it will serve as a disincentive for new funds to begin. I would urge you to add to the list of questions that you ask of yourself and your colleagues: 'is this decision going to make it easier or harder for professionals to launch a new fund'."
However, Morelli admitted: "There has to be a balance, ensuring there are rules that prevent pension funds from excessive risk taking, but ultimately you have to let the market decide. You can't nanny every pension fund because that will distort the way they invest. The commission should change tax completely, going from 'let's restrain this' to 'how do we spur the growth of occupational pension funds?' That is where the long-term capital that creates the jobs of the future will come from."
Latest News
Stonehage Fleming raises USD 130m for largest fund to date, eyes 2024 programme
Multi-family office has seen strong appetite, with investor base growing since 2016 to more than 90 family offices, Meiping Yap told Unquote
Permira to take Ergomed private for GBP 703m
Sponsor deploys Permira VIII to ride new wave of take-privates; Blackstone commits GBP 200m in financing for UK-based CRO
Partners Group to release IMs for Civica sale in mid-September
Sponsor acquired the public software group in July 2017 via the same-year vintage Partners Group Global Value 2017
Change of mind: Sponsors take to de-listing their own assets
EQT and Cinven seen as bellweather for funds to reassess options for listed assets trading underwater